[llvm-dev] Clang Optimizer freaks out on "simple" goto code?
Dennis Luehring via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Dec 5 03:32:43 PST 2016
FYI
found this example while reading:
https://github.com/jameysharp/corrode/issues/30#issuecomment-231969365
and compared it with current gcc 6.2, clang 3.9
gcc 6.2 result is quite small - clang 3.9 produces much much more code
for this example
https://godbolt.org/g/uWxr8F
is that a missing optimization opportunity or just wrong behavior of the
optimizer?
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list