[llvm-dev] Why does new llvm-as reject old IR format?
Madhur Amilkanthwar via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Aug 12 06:42:49 PDT 2016
Hi all,
I have the below input
define i32 @myCas(i32* %ptr, i32 %cmp, i32 %val) #0 {
entry:
%0 = cmpxchg volatile i32* %ptr, i32 %cmp, i32 %val seq_cst
%1 = extractvalue { i32, i1 } %0, 0
ret i32 %1
}
When I provide this input file to llvm-as 3.6 I get the error
a.ll: error: Expected ordering on atomic instruction
%1 = extractvalue { i32, i1 } %0, 0
This is because instruction syntax of cmpxchg has changed since 3.2
requiring failing order as well.
Ideally, I would expect backward compatibility from LLVM tools; and not
requiring to modify the code again.
What is LLVM's philosophy here?
--
*Disclaimer: Views, concerns, thoughts, questions, ideas expressed in this
mail are of my own and my employer has no take in it. *
Thank You.
Madhur D. Amilkanthwar
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160812/7ca4f96a/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list