[llvm-dev] phys reg liveness during foldMemoryOperandImpl()

Jonas Paulsson via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Apr 28 01:52:26 PDT 2016


Does that mean that there is a LiveInterval created for all def-uses of 
physical registers? While looking quickly, I only saw a method for 
preg-arguments constructing such LIs. Not sure if it is done for e.g. a 
compare - branch sequence, for the CC reg?

/Jonas


On 2016-04-27 23:31, Matthias Braun wrote:
> I would expect that it shouldn't be too hard to pass around a reference to LiveIntervalAnalysis*. Patches welcome :)
>
> - Matthias
>
>> On Apr 27, 2016, at 11:38 AM, Jonas Paulsson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> ping.
>>
>> Either this can be implemented easily, or the current SystemZ optimization LAY -> AGSI in foldMemoryOperandImpl() should be removed, since this is actually illegal.
>>
>> /Jonas
>>
>> On 2016-04-15 12:53, Jonas Paulsson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I wonder if it would be possible to extend foldMemoryOperandImp() so that targets can check for liveness of a particular phys reg?
>>>
>>> The case I am thinking of is when the new instruction clobbers the CC reg, while the old one did not. In this case the new instruction can only become a replacement if the CC reg is known to be dead.
>>>
>>> The idea is that liveness of phys regs should be available somehow when this functionis called during regalloc. Part of the issue is the fact that CC reg is not an allocatable register.
>>>
>>> /Jonas Paulsson
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list