[llvm-dev] [RFC] LNT Feature: tracking performance changes

[David Blaikie via llvm-dev]

Usual caveats apply: timely, narrow-blame, low false positive, and ideally
reproducible (cheaply/easily). Or the emails/issues won't be
actionable/actioned.

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Chris Matthews via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> I agree.  I plan to implement that next!
>
> On Sep 21, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>
>  However, I think that unless we're able to e-mail commit authors who
> cause regressions like we do for buildbot failures, as well as others who
> are architecture performance experts on the relevant systems, this won't
> see the use it needs.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150921/4ba91eb1/attachment-0001.html>