[llvm-dev] RFC: speedups with instruction side-data (ADCE, perhaps others?)

escha via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Sep 14 14:47:41 PDT 2015


I would assume that it’s just considered to be garbage. I feel like any sort of per-pass side data like this should come with absolute minimal contracts, to avoid introducing any more inter-pass complexity.

—escha

> On Sep 14, 2015, at 2:28 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> What is the contract between passes for the marker bit? I.e. do passes need to "clean up" the marker bit to a predetermined value after they run? (or they need to assume that it might be dirty? (like I think you do below))
> 
> -- Sean Silva
> 
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:37 AM, escha via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
> I’ve been playing around with optimizing performance various passes and noticed something about ADCE: it keeps an Alive set that requires a lot of upkeep time-wise, but if each instruction had a /single bit/ of side data (to represent liveness, solely within the pass), the set wouldn’t be needed. I tested this out and observed a ~1/3 reduction in time in ADCE: 1454ms to 982ms according to a profile over our test suite (for a total of 0.6% compile time savings in our pipeline).
> 
> Are there any other passes that could benefit from having a single bit (or similarly small amount) of per-Instruction metadata local to the pass, i.e. to avoid having to keep a side-Set of instructions that’s only used to test membership of the set (i.e. not iterated over)? Is this sort of thing something reasonable (maybe it could be stuffed in the SubclassData short and exposed via a public API?)
> 
> —escha
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150914/441edf37/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list