[LLVMdev] Multiple connected components in live interval

[Quentin Colombet]

Jonas checked that this patch fixes his issue.

Committed revision 236658.

Q.
> On Apr 29, 2015, at 3:05 PM, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jonas,
> 
> Could you check if the attached patch fix your problem?
> 
> Thanks,
> -Quentin
> <multiple_components.patch>
> 
>> On Apr 24, 2015, at 2:06 PM, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com <mailto:qcolombet at apple.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Jonas,
>> 
>> I won’t have time to look at it this week after all.
>> I’ll try to do that next week.
>> If you do not hear back from me by end of next, do not hesitate to ping me!
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> -Quentin
>>> On Apr 22, 2015, at 9:32 AM, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com <mailto:qcolombet at apple.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Apr 21, 2015, at 11:49 PM, Jonas Paulsson <jonas.paulsson at ericsson.com <mailto:jonas.paulsson at ericsson.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I looked at SplitKit, but I am not sure how to best do it, so it would be great if you could take a look.
>>> 
>>> Sure.
>>> I will try to do that by the end of the week.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Q.
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> /Jonas
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 2015-04-21 19:35, Quentin Colombet wrote:
>>>>>> On Apr 21, 2015, at 7:40 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk <mailto:stoklund at 2pi.dk>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Apr 21, 2015, at 05:39, Jonas Paulsson <jonas.paulsson at ericsson.com <mailto:jonas.paulsson at ericsson.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Could it then be that the RegisterCoalescer should split live ranges when LIS->shrinkToUses() return true? Why does it not do that,     when the verifier demands this?
>>>>>> I think it should. That's an oversight.
>>>>> Yep, this is likely the problem.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jonas, do you think you can investigate a fix, or do you want me to look at it?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> -Quentin
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu <http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/>
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu <http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/>
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150506/d5d26920/attachment.html>