[LLVMdev] libiomp, not libgomp as default library linked with -fopenmp

[C Bergström]

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "C Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com>
>> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
>> Cc: "James H Cownie" <james.h.cownie at intel.com>, "Andrey Bokhanko" <andreybokhanko at gmail.com>, "cfe-dev"
>> <cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "Douglas Gregor" <dgregor at apple.com>,
>> "Michael Wong" <fraggamuffin at gmail.com>, "Alexey Bataev" <a.bataev at gmx.com>, "Chandler Carruth"
>> <chandlerc at google.com>, "Richard Smith" <richard at metafoo.co.uk>
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 10:43:59 AM
>> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] libiomp, not libgomp as default library linked with -fopenmp
>>
>> Why is this thread still going? Isn't the most pragmatic choice to
>> just make it a build configuration option and be done? Then whoever
>> is
>> actually packaging it can make the most sensible choice for their
>> needs..
>>
>> Should I send a patch so this bikeshed thread can die?
>
> Yes, please send a patch.

Ok - I'll assume it's settled and this thread is dead unless someone
objects. Give me 1-2 days and I'll send something for review.

Thanks