[LLVMdev] Preserving the order of WRITE_REGISTER, READ_REGISTER in IR and ISelDAG

[Johnson, Nicholas Paul]

FYI, I have submitted a bug and a proposed fix: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23389

>-----Original Message-----
>From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
>On Behalf Of Johnson, Nicholas Paul
>Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 1:26 PM
>To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
>Subject: [LLVMdev] Preserving the order of WRITE_REGISTER, READ_REGISTER
>in IR and ISelDAG
>
>Hello,
>
>I have a few questions regarding intrinsics llvm.write_register,
>llvm.read_register and the corresponding selection DAG node types
>ISD::WRITE_REGISTER, ISD::READ_REGISTER.  As background, I'll mention that
>Clang emits these in response to variables declared as ``register int eax
>asm("eax");''
>
>(1) Per include/llvm/IR/Intrinsics.td, the intrinsic llvm.write_register is
>modeled with a memory side effect, but llvm.read_register is not (i.e, the
>intrinsic is declared with IntrNoMem).  If I understand correctly, this means
>that the relative ordering of calls to llvm.write_register will be preserved,
>but that optimizations may freely reorder llvm.read_register.  Why is this?  It
>seems like llvm.read_register should be ordered w.r.t. llvm.write_register,
>or the register-asm syntax is pretty much useless.
>
>(2) Per SelectionDAGBuilder::visitIntrinsicCall, the Chain operand for
>ISD::WRITE_REGISTER SDNodes is derived from the second operand of the
>llvm.write_register intrinsic call (i.e., from the value being written to the
>registger), as follows:
>
>  // excerpt from lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
>  case Intrinsic::write_register: {
>    Value *Reg = I.getArgOperand(0);
>    Value *RegValue = I.getArgOperand(1);
>    SDValue Chain = getValue(RegValue).getOperand(0);
>    SDValue RegName =
>      DAG.getMDNode(cast<MDNode>(cast<MetadataAsValue>(Reg)-
>>getMetadata()));
>    DAG.setRoot(DAG.getNode(ISD::WRITE_REGISTER, sdl, MVT::Other, Chain,
>      RegName, getValue(RegValue)));
>    return nullptr;
>  }
>
>Is this a bug?  It seems that the chain should instead be the selection DAG
>root, as so:
>
>-    SDValue Chain = getValue(RegValue).getOperand(0);
>+   SDValue Chain = DAG.getRoot();
>
>
>Thank you,
>Nick
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>LLVM Developers mailing list
>LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev