[LLVMdev] Target-specific defaults for LLVM tools?

[Steve King]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Jonathan Roelofs
<jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
> The "proper solution" here w.r.t. assemblers is to implement full support
> for the integrated assembler for the target arch in llvm, and then flip the
> default for that target.
>

But that is the same as saying LLVM offers no compiler driver until
integrated assembly is robust for your target, no?  Given that ARM
took a long time to get there, why not grant other targets that grace
period too?