[LLVMdev] [RFC] WebAssembly Backend

[Dan Gohman]

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> I agree, developing the backend in tree is the best path. Specifically, it is the best way for the community to monitor the development and ensure proper test coverage. Obviously, there are some number of files needed for a backend to be minimally functional, and I think that putting those together and submitting them for review as a new experimental backend is perfectly appropriate.

For people following this thread, I've now posted such a patch here:

http://reviews.llvm.org/D10569

Dan