[LLVMdev] Inline hint for methods defined in-class
Balaram Makam
bmakam at codeaurora.org
Wed Jun 17 16:07:19 PDT 2015
AFAIK, this was fixed in r233817.
-----Original Message-----
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On
Behalf Of Easwaran Raman
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 6:59 PM
To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Cc: David Li
Subject: [LLVMdev] Inline hint for methods defined in-class
Clang adds the InlineHint attribute to functions that are explicitly marked
inline, but not if they are defined in the class body. I tried the following
patch, which I believe handles the in-class definition
case:
--- a/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp
@@ -630,7 +630,7 @@ void CodeGenFunction::StartFunction(GlobalDecl GD,
if (const FunctionDecl *FD = dyn_cast_or_null<FunctionDecl>(D)) {
if (!CGM.getCodeGenOpts().NoInline) {
for (auto RI : FD->redecls())
- if (RI->isInlineSpecified()) {
+ if (RI->isInlined()) {
Fn->addFnAttr(llvm::Attribute::InlineHint);
break;
}
I tried this on C++ benchmarks in SPEC 2006. There is no noticeable
performance difference and the maximum text size increase is < 0.25%.
I then built clang with and without this change. This increases the text
size by 4.1%. For measuring performance, I compiled a large (4.8 million
lines) preprocessed file. This change improves runtime performance by 0.9%
(average of 10 runs) in O0 and O2.
I think knowing whether a function is defined inside a class body is a
useful hint to the inliner. FWIW, GCC's inliner doesn't differentiate these
from explicit inline functions. If the above results doesn't justify this
change, are there other benchmarks that I should evaluate? Another
possibility is to add a separate hint for this instead of using the existing
inlinehint to allow for better tuning in the inliner.
Thanks,
Easwaran
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list