[LLVMdev] Problem with InsertPointGuard ABI?
Paweł Bylica
chfast at gmail.com
Tue Jul 21 09:36:23 PDT 2015
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:30 PM Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote:
> Paweł Bylica <chfast at gmail.com> writes:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:55 PM Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Paweł Bylica <chfast at gmail.com> writes:
> > > I can confirm that the issue has been caused by NDEBUG flag.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 6:29 PM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > The layout of AssertingVH has depended on NDEBUG since 2009,
> which
> > > predates any of our efforts to make LLVM's ABI resilient to
> > mismatched
> > > NDEBUG definitions between LLVM and its users.
> > >
> > > For now, make sure your definition of NDEBUG matches LLVM's.
> In the
> > long
> > > run, we could conceivably do something
> > > with LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS to allow this mismatch.
> > >
> > > In practice it is very hard to make NDEBUG flag match configs of
> your
> > project
> > > and LLVM project. You often need to build debug and release
> versions of
> > your
> > > project and LLVM is installed as a debian package or with homebrew.
> > Moreover,
> > > there is not reliable way of checking if LLVM has been built with
> or
> > without
> > > NDEBUG.
> >
> > FWIW, `llvm-config --assertion-mode` will tell you whether or not
> your
> > LLVM was built with or without NDEBUG.
> >
> > That's not true in all cases. In case CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release,
> > LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=Off and CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="" llvm-config
> reports
> > asserts as off but NDEBUG flag is not set.
>
> Um, okay, but why would you set CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE=""? That doesn't
> make any sense...
>
I agree, it make no sense. But homebrew actually does that:
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/blob/master/Library/Homebrew/formula.rb#L615
There are many possible solutions for this case:
1. Force NDEBUG flag
2. Report a cmake error.
3. Get rid of LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS flag and relay on NDEBUG flag only.
>
> >
> > > Can I do anything more about it? Contributions related to
> > > LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS needed?
> > >
> > > - Paweł
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150721/f9274e74/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list