[LLVMdev] why LoopUnswitch pass does not constant fold conditional branch and merge blocks
Chen Li
meloli87 at gmail.com
Thu Jul 16 16:10:01 PDT 2015
Hi,
I have a general question on LoopUnswtich pass.
Consider the following IR snippet:
define i32 @test(i1 %cond) {
br label %loop_begin
loop_begin:
br i1 %cond, label %loop_body, label %loop_exit
loop_body:
br label %do_something
do_something:
call void @some_func() noreturn nounwind
br label %loop_begin
loop_exit:
ret i32 0
}
declare void @some_func() noreturn
After running it through "opt -loop-unswitch -S", it unswitched loop on %cond and produced result like this:
define i32 @test(i1 %cond) {
br i1 %cond, label %..split_crit_edge, label %.loop_exit.split_crit_edge
.loop_exit.split_crit_edge: ; preds = %0
br label %loop_exit.split
..split_crit_edge: ; preds = %0
br label %.split
.split: ; preds = %..split_crit_edge
br label %loop_begin
loop_begin: ; preds = %do_something, %.split
br i1 true, label %loop_body, label %loop_exit
loop_body: ; preds = %loop_begin
br label %do_something
do_something: ; preds = %loop_body
call void @some_func() #1
br label %loop_begin
loop_exit: ; preds = %loop_begin
br label %loop_exit.split
loop_exit.split: ; preds = %.loop_exit.split_crit_edge, %loop_exit
ret i32 0
}
We see it did not constant fold "br i1 true, label %loop_body, label %loop_exit" and merge %loop_body into %loop_begin.
My understanding is that later llvm passes (likely -simplifycfg) will cleanup the code properly and doing this in LoopUnswtich pass is duplicated. However, consider the following case:
define i32 @test(i32* %var, i1 %cond1, i1 %cond2) {
br label %loop_begin
loop_begin:
br i1 %cond1, label %continue, label %loop_exit
continue:
%var_val = load i32, i32* %var
br i1 %cond2, label %do_something, label %loop_exit
do_something:
call void @some_func() noreturn nounwind
br label %loop_begin
loop_exit:
ret i32 0
}
Assume you don't have enough budget to do non-trivial loop unswtich (for test purpose, set -loop-unswitch-threshold=0 with opt), the result would be:
define i32 @test(i32* %var, i1 %cond1, i1 %cond2) {
br i1 %cond1, label %..split_crit_edge, label %.loop_exit.split_crit_edge
.loop_exit.split_crit_edge: ; preds = %0
br label %loop_exit.split
..split_crit_edge: ; preds = %0
br label %.split
.split: ; preds = %..split_crit_edge
br label %loop_begin
loop_begin: ; preds = %do_something, %.split
br i1 true, label %continue, label %loop_exit
continue: ; preds = %loop_begin
%var_val = load i32, i32* %var
br i1 %cond2, label %do_something, label %loop_exit
do_something: ; preds = %continue
call void @some_func() #1
br label %loop_begin
loop_exit: ; preds = %continue, %loop_begin
br label %loop_exit.split
loop_exit.split: ; preds = %.loop_exit.split_crit_edge, %loop_exit
ret i32 0
}
The remaining loop (%loop_begin) in the result actually contains a trivial unswitch condition (on %cond2), which should always unswitch because there is no code growth. However, because the branch in loop header is not constant folded and %continue is not merged into %loop_begin, LoopUnswtich pass can not recongnize the trivial unswitch condition (in the current implementation, trivial unswitch condition must be loop header’s terminator). If this is the last LoopUnswtich pass in the optimization pipeline, we will miss the trivial unswitch opportunity.
So would it be reasonable to add branch constant folding into LoopUnswtich pass for this kind of cases?
thanks,
chen
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list