[LLVMdev] New linker ownership

[Chandler Carruth]

FWIW, that seems reasonable at some point, although it might be useful to
wait until you've had more patches and stuff land? I would assume that Nick
is still a reasonable owner for all those parts, but mayba that's not the
case?

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 5:04 PM Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Rui,
>
> > so I'd like to be an owner of the new linkers (both for ELF and COFF),
> ...
>
> Sounds good to me.
>
> Do you mind if I add myself as a code owner for LLD Core / MachO, since
> I'll be continuing to work on that?
>
> Cheers,
> Lang.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On 15 July 2015 at 00:08, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
>> > Historically LLD has been suffered by over-designing and
>> over-engineering. I
>> > don't want to repeat that again in the new codebase, so I'd like to be
>> an
>> > owner of the new linkers (both for ELF and COFF), so that I'm
>> responsible to
>> > ensure all patches are reviewed (whether pre-commit or post-commit) if
>> > submitted to one of ELF or COFF directories.
>>
>> Thanks Rui! That'd be great!
>>
>> cheers,
>> --renato
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150716/60799d7a/attachment.html>