[LLVMdev] always-inline heuristic

[Gerolf Hoflehner]

There have been extensive discussions about this on about 8 month ago on the mailing list. You’ll also find some comments in the code. We first have to improve points-to analysis before we think about revisiting inlining functions with indirect  branches.

Always-inline just means inline when the compiler can determine that it is safe to so.

-Gerolf

]. 
> On Jan 29, 2015, at 11:27 AM, Xin Tong <trent.tong at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I see that we do not inline a function marked as "always-inline" if it contains indirect branches ? what are the reasons behind this criterion ?
> 
> Thanks
> Trent
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150129/87ce0f8c/attachment.html>