[LLVMdev] [lld] Removal of ELF PowerPC port
Sidney Manning
sidneym at codeaurora.org
Mon Jan 26 13:02:17 PST 2015
I'm OK with the removal of the PPC support. It was a big-endian target and I thought it would be handy to have one at the time.
Thanks,
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Spencer [mailto:bigcheesegs at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 12:37 PM
To: Will Newton; Sidney Manning
Cc: llvm-dev
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [lld] Removal of ELF PowerPC port
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Will Newton <will.newton at linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The PowerPC ELF backend of LLD is not in a particularly good state. It
> supports one relocation, has one test, and it does not seem to have
> received any commits other than tree-wide refactors since it was
> initially committed. It is also structured slightly differently to the
> other backends which means that refactoring patches that touch all the
> backends are made more difficult.
>
> Is anyone interested in maintaining this backend or would it be better
> to remove it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Will Newton
> Toolchain Working Group, Linaro
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
I've CCed Sidney, who is the original committer of the PPC support.
I'm fine with removing it for now if nobody steps up as it's making refactors difficult.
- Michael Spencer
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list