[LLVMdev] X86TarIgetLowering::LowerToBT
Stephen Canon
scanon at apple.com
Fri Jan 23 10:28:52 PST 2015
No, because it uses the 32b form “testl”.
– Steve
> On Jan 23, 2015, at 1:27 PM, Chris Sears <chris.sears at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is that a bug in the current clang then?
>
> .globl _IsBitSet31
> .align 4, 0x90
> _IsBitSet31: ## @IsBitSet31
> .cfi_startproc
> ## BB#0:
> pushq %rbp
> Ltmp157:
> .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
> Ltmp158:
> .cfi_offset %rbp, -16
> movq %rsp, %rbp
> Ltmp159:
> .cfi_def_cfa_register %rbp
> movl $42, %ecx
> subq %rdi, %rcx
> leaq 47(%rdi), %rax
> testl $-2147483648, %edi ## imm = 0xFFFFFFFF80000000
> cmoveq %rcx, %rax
> popq %rbp
> retq
>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list