[LLVMdev] How are wrong-code bugs handled?

[Dimitry Andric]

On 16 Jan 2015, at 17:11, WAITZ Martin (AREVA) <martin.waitz at areva.com> wrote:
> 
> What about the wrong-code bug 21394 [1] for clang 3.5?
> Is that handled by anybody?
> 
> [1] http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21394

In this form, it is not very likely.  You can do a few additional things to help, though:

* Provide a preprocessed test case (since this includes QtCore code of an unknown version)
* Re-test using the latest top-of-trunk
* If it still reproduces with top-of-trunk, provide a minimized test case (using multidelta or creduce)

-Dimitry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150117/194c3611/attachment.sig>