[LLVMdev] RFC: Loop distribution/Partial vectorization
Krzysztof Parzyszek
kparzysz at codeaurora.org
Wed Jan 14 08:25:05 PST 2015
On 1/13/2015 1:05 PM, Adam Nemet wrote:
>
> This would take some improvements to the current memory dependence checker which handles a single loop right now. Do you have some standard algorithms in mind that would benefit from this?
The first candidate would be the loop distribution itself---it would be
able to handle more cases, even if its purpose is vectorization.
Overall, any loop nest transformation would be a consumer of such
information, but that probably wouldn't get past polly advocates. :)
If I come up with another motivating example other than the above, I'll
let you know.
-Krzysztof
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list