[LLVMdev] LLD Standalone CMake build

[Sean Silva]

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm hoping to revive the LLD standalone CMake build.
>
>
> Why?
>
> It adds complexity and cost to everyone who has to touch the build system.
>
> Note that even if you're willing to "maintain" the standalone build, that
> doesn't *really* fix the problem. Lots of folks will need to make changes
> to the build system, and these types of different supported usage scenarios
> make these much harder to think about, enact, and test.
>
> Having to build and test and install using 3 or 4 different combinations
> of standalone and not standalone is a complete nightmare. I'm pretty
> strongly opposed to more standalone build support unless developers on the
> project have really serious problems with IDE scaling.
>

I doubt IDE scaling would be an issue in this particular scenario. LLD is
so small relative to LLVM that it shouldn't cause a noticeable burden for
the IDE.

-- Sean Silva


> Honestly, if we could fix the IDE scaling, I'd rip all of the standalone
> build support out of all of our CMake builds.
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150108/c7bc0000/attachment.html>