[LLVMdev] Thoughts on limited forward serialization?
Philip Reames
listmail at philipreames.com
Tue Jan 6 16:23:08 PST 2015
Duncan,
I was wondering if you'd be open to making a change in the IR parser to
accept and ignore 'metadata' keywords in the places they used to be
required. My common workflow is to use a version of clang (from the
last major release) to generate test IR fragments. Right now, this is
not possible since IR generated by the previous released clang no longer
parses with TOT.
I know we don't generally support forward serialization of IR, but in
practice, it generally works for this type of usage. What do you think?
Philip
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list