[LLVMdev] [RFC] AArch64: Should we disable GlobalMerge?

Ahmed Bougacha ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com
Fri Feb 27 14:15:44 PST 2015


On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
> On 27 February 2015 at 21:26, Ahmed Bougacha <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Which brings us to my fallback proposal:  what about disabling the
>> pass on darwin only?
>
> That's a decision for Jim/Evan. I'm ok if they are.

Jim, thoughts?

>
>> As for other targets, as a first step, making the pass run under -O3
>> rather than -O1 is hopefully agreeable to everyone?
>
> Sounds reasonable.

Great!

> Even though it conflicts with LTO, that's what O3 means, as you said,
> instability. People at O3 might want to fiddle with the passes
> (on/off) to get the best performance for their own code/workload.

By the way, I'm not convinced LTO being either -O3 or -O0 is sensible.
But that's a discussion for another day =)

-Ahmed

> cheers,
> --renato



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list