[LLVMdev] [PATCH 1/2 v3] configure: add visibility macro detection to configure
Sedat Dilek
sedat.dilek at gmail.com
Tue Feb 17 21:03:48 PST 2015
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de> wrote:
>> This adds clang/gcc visibility macro detection to configure and util/macros.h.
>> This is can be used to conveniently add e.g. a "HIDDEN" attribute to a function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de>
>> ---
>> v2: use VISIBILITY_*FLAGS instead of *FLAGS directly
>> v3: no change
>>
>> configure.ac | 28 ++++++----------------------
>> src/util/macros.h | 6 ++++++
>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
>> index 351027b..266764a 100644
>> --- a/configure.ac
>> +++ b/configure.ac
>> @@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ AX_GCC_FUNC_ATTRIBUTE([flatten])
>> AX_GCC_FUNC_ATTRIBUTE([format])
>> AX_GCC_FUNC_ATTRIBUTE([malloc])
>> AX_GCC_FUNC_ATTRIBUTE([packed])
>> +AX_GCC_FUNC_ATTRIBUTE([visibility])
>>
>> AM_CONDITIONAL([GEN_ASM_OFFSETS], test "x$GEN_ASM_OFFSETS" = xyes)
>>
>> @@ -245,17 +246,13 @@ if test "x$GCC" = xyes; then
>> AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]),
>> [CFLAGS="$save_CFLAGS -Wmissing-prototypes";
>> AC_MSG_RESULT([no])]);
>> + CFLAGS=$save_CFLAGS
>>
>> # Enable -fvisibility=hidden if using a gcc that supports it
>
> Can you restore this comment with a general pointer to "...compiler
> that support it".
>
> BTW, what is the compiler option called for clang to suppress
> visibility(-hiden) feature - ... -fvisibility=no ?
> I would like to test w/o your patches.
>
> - Sedat -
>
>> - save_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
>> - AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether $CC supports -fvisibility=hidden])
>> - VISIBILITY_CFLAGS="-fvisibility=hidden"
>> - CFLAGS="$CFLAGS $VISIBILITY_CFLAGS"
>> - AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM()], AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]),
>> - [VISIBILITY_CFLAGS=""; AC_MSG_RESULT([no])]);
>> -
>> - # Restore CFLAGS; VISIBILITY_CFLAGS are added to it where needed.
>> - CFLAGS=$save_CFLAGS
>> + if test "x${ax_cv_have_func_attribute_visibility}" = xyes; then
>> + VISIBILITY_CFLAGS="-fvisibility=hidden"
>> + VISIBILITY_CXXFLAGS="-fvisibility=hidden"
>> + fi
>>
>> # Work around aliasing bugs - developers should comment this out
>> CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fno-strict-aliasing"
>> @@ -267,19 +264,6 @@ fi
>> if test "x$GXX" = xyes; then
>> CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -Wall"
>>
>> - # Enable -fvisibility=hidden if using a gcc that supports it
>> - save_CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS"
>> - AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether $CXX supports -fvisibility=hidden])
>> - VISIBILITY_CXXFLAGS="-fvisibility=hidden"
>> - CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS $VISIBILITY_CXXFLAGS"
>> - AC_LANG_PUSH([C++])
>> - AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM()], AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]),
>> - [VISIBILITY_CXXFLAGS="" ; AC_MSG_RESULT([no])]);
>> - AC_LANG_POP([C++])
>> -
>> - # Restore CXXFLAGS; VISIBILITY_CXXFLAGS are added to it where needed.
>> - CXXFLAGS=$save_CXXFLAGS
>> -
>> # Work around aliasing bugs - developers should comment this out
>> CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -fno-strict-aliasing"
>>
>> diff --git a/src/util/macros.h b/src/util/macros.h
>> index eec8b93..7682511 100644
>> --- a/src/util/macros.h
>> +++ b/src/util/macros.h
>> @@ -117,6 +117,12 @@ do { \
>> #define PRINTFLIKE(f, a)
>> #endif
>>
>> +#ifdef HAVE_FUNC_ATTRIBUTE_VISIBILITY
>> +#define HIDDEN __attribute__((visibility("hidden")))
>> +#else
>> +#define HIDDEN
>> +#endif
>> +
>> #ifdef HAVE_FUNC_ATTRIBUTE_MALLOC
>> #define MALLOCLIKE __attribute__((__malloc__))
>> #else
>> --
>> 2.2.2
>>
Here the fix for the comment in visibility macro detection.
- Sedat -
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-configure-Fix-comment-in-visibility-macro-detection.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 943 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150218/e929a564/attachment.patch>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list