[LLVMdev] Moving towards a singular pointer type

Josh Klontz josh.klontz at gmail.com
Tue Feb 17 18:30:29 PST 2015


On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Colin LeMahieu <colinl at codeaurora.org>
wrote:

>
>
> One migration issue I could see is any time a frontend depends on the LLVM
> type system for tracking types rather than doing it itself.
>
>
>

This. An idiom I've used extensively is
pointer-to-struct-with-name-mangled-type-information. Because of this I can
rely on LLVM entirely for type tracking, which feels like a good thing. It
shouldn't be a big migration issue in my case, but I'd appreciate any words
of wisdom from the LLVM community.

v/r,
Josh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150217/12994889/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list