[LLVMdev] [RFC] Progress report on CMake build system's ability to replace autoconf

Joerg Sonnenberger joerg at britannica.bec.de
Tue Feb 17 12:21:15 PST 2015


On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 09:03:11AM +0000, Zachary Turner wrote:
> +Ed Maste, who maintains FreeBSD's LLDB and probably does not check this
> very often.  I know (or at least am pretty sure) that they are using
> autoconf over there, so he may be aware of other issues.

Just for the record, as far as NetBSD is concerned, LLDB without
autoconf is a non-issue. autoconf is only relevant for the
bootstrapping, so code outside llvm, clang and maybe lld is perfectly
acceptable as cmake-only.

Joerg



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list