[LLVMdev] COFF on-disk section alignment Was: Re: [cfe-dev] [PATCH] Wrap clang modules inside Mach-O/ELF/COFF containers
Adrian Prantl
aprantl at apple.com
Wed Feb 11 11:39:25 PST 2015
On Jan 30, 2015, at 6:04 PM, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote:
> The big drawback is that I can no longer influence the order in which the sections are emitted, which turns out to be a problem for COFF.
> Although COFF sections are marked with the correct alignment characteristics, they are not actually emitted aligned on disk. This is hopefully just a bug in our COFF backend. Since the DWARF sections are of arbitrary size and come before the serialized AST, this messes up the alignment for OnDiskHashTable. Until I figure out a solution for this problem, I’ve disabled module debug info ouput for COFF.
[CC’ing a bunch of people who recently touched the COFF streamer.]
I’m creating a new section via a global variable like this:
auto *ASTSym = new llvm::GlobalVariable(
*M, Ty, /*constant*/ true, llvm::GlobalVariable::InternalLinkage,
Data, "__clang_ast");
ASTSym->setAlignment(8);
ASTSym->setSection("clangast”);
and llvm-readobj tells me it comes out as:
Section {
Number: 12
Name: clangast (63 6C 61 6E 67 61 73 74)
VirtualSize: 0x0
VirtualAddress: 0x0
RawDataSize: 148992
PointerToRawData: 0x4FB <-- 1275
PointerToRelocations: 0x0
PointerToLineNumbers: 0x0
RelocationCount: 0
LineNumberCount: 0
Characteristics [ (0x40400040)
IMAGE_SCN_ALIGN_8BYTES (0x400000)
IMAGE_SCN_CNT_INITIALIZED_DATA (0x40)
IMAGE_SCN_MEM_READ (0x40000000)
]
}
or in assembly:
...
Lsection_debug_loc:
.section .debug_ranges,"r"
Ldebug_range:
.section clangast,"dr"
.align 8
___clang_ast:
...
Even though the section has the IMAGE_SCN_ALIGN_8BYTES characteristic and the symbol is aligned, the ___clang_ast symbol is still emitted to disk immediately following the previous section and thus ends up at a random unaligned address. This breaks OnDiskHashtable when the object file is mmapped from disk later.
Am I using it wrong or is this a bug in the coff backend?
Any ideas how to fix it?
-- adrian
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list