[llvm-dev] [RFC] Intrinsic naming convention (words with dots)
Philip Reames via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Dec 2 15:44:59 PST 2015
This proposal - dots as namespaces, underscore for words - would be my
preferred scheme, but I really don't have much of a strong preference.
Any reasonable scheme which is documented and consistent works for me.
On 12/01/2015 09:15 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev wrote:
> On 12/1/2015 4:26 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev wrote:
>> I propose that we standardize on (2) -- words with dots -- as it
>> seems to have a plurality of more-recent intrinsics (and I think it
>> is easy to read, as is (3)). Thoughts?
> How about using dots to separate "contexts" and underscores to
> separate words, e.g.
> llvm.gc.* --stuff related to GC
More information about the llvm-dev