[llvm-dev] [3.7 Release] RC3 has been tagged, let's wrap this up

[Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev]

Hm, it does not seem to compile at all here?  The build ends with:

In file included from /home/dim/llvm-3.7.0/rc3/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/ApplyReplacements.cpp:17:
/home/dim/llvm-3.7.0/rc3/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/../../include/clang-apply-replacements/Tooling/ApplyReplacements.h:19:10: fatal error: 'clang/Tooling/Refactoring.h' file not found
#include "clang/Tooling/Refactoring.h"
         ^
1 error generated.

Any idea?  I had no problems at all with -rc2.

-Dimitry

> On 21 Aug 2015, at 02:51, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
> 3.7-rc3 has just been tagged. Testers, please test, build binaries,
> upload to the sftp and report results to this thread.
> 
> Again, a lot of patches got merged between rc2 and rc3, but hopefully
> nothing that should upset things.
> 
> One thing that did change is that the release script now correctly
> symlinks clang-tools-extra into the build. If this causes problems on
> your platform, please just remove it.
> 
> This is a release candidate in the real sense: at this point I have
> zero release blockers on my radar. I will now only accept fixes for
> critical regressions, and if nothing comes up, rc3 will be promoted to
> 3.7.0-final.
> 
> Documentation and release note patches are still welcome all the way
> up until the final tag goes in.
> 
> Issues that were on my radar, but I don't consider blocking:
> 
> - Sanitizer test failures on various platforms, e.g. PR24222. We never
> ran these tests in previous releases, so it's not a regression. It
> would be great if the sanitizer folks could look into the test
> failures, but it's not blocking 3.7.
> 
> - PR24273: "[ARM] Libc++abi built in-tree with libunwind fails in
> __cxa_allocate_exception", Renato will exclude libc++ from his build
> for now.
> 
> - Lack of key functions in some Instruction classes causing build
> failures without -fno-rtti
> (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-August/089010.html). No
> patches have been forthcoming, so this will not get fixed for 3.7. At
> least we correctly report -fno-rtti in llvm-config built with CMake
> now.
> 
> - r244221: "[SPARC] Don't compare arch name as a string, use the enum
> instead", owner is unresponsive.
> 
> - "[lldb] r245020 - [MIPS]Handle floating point and aggregate return
> types in SysV-mips [32 bit] ABI", owner is unresponsive.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Hans

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150821/6020c744/attachment.sig>