[LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question

[Ryan Taylor]

Simply replacing the && with || did not fix the issue. This issue still
exists after making those changes. There is maybe some other code that
needs to be changed also?

Thanks.

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Daniel,
>
>   Ok, thanks. Simple fix. We'll just make correction in local copy for
> now, one less thing to port later :)
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Daniel Sanders <
> Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote:
>
>> I've just looked at my checkout of 3.6 and it looks like the fix wasn't
>> merged. I don't have the revision number for the fix to hand but in
>> lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp, this:
>>
>>   MatchFilterBB = (!FilterDAGBasicBlockName.empty() &&
>>
>>                    FilterDAGBasicBlockName ==
>>
>>                        FuncInfo->MBB->getBasicBlock()->getName().str());
>>
>> Should be:
>>
>>   MatchFilterBB = (FilterDAGBasicBlockName.empty() ||
>>
>>                    FilterDAGBasicBlockName ==
>>
>>                        FuncInfo->MBB->getBasicBlock()->getName().str());
>>
>>
>>
>> The trunk has the correct code so the option should be ok for LLVM 3.7.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Ryan Taylor [mailto:ryta1203 at gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* 27 July 2015 17:20
>> *To:* Daniel Sanders
>> *Cc:* llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
>> *Subject:* Re: [LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question
>>
>>
>>
>> Daniel,
>>
>>
>>
>>   We are using 3.6. Someone also pointed out that it was mandatory in
>> 3.6.2 but I have not verified that.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Daniel Sanders <
>> Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote:
>>
>> It's not supposed to be. There was a short period where it was
>> unintentionally mandatory but this was fixed after I pointed it out during
>> post-commit review.
>>
>>
>>
>> Which version/revision are you using?
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] *On
>> Behalf Of *Ryan Taylor
>> *Sent:* 27 July 2015 16:27
>> *To:* llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
>> *Subject:* [LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question
>>
>>
>>
>> Is this option currently mandatory? If so, why? If not, I'm not sure
>> what's been added that I need to do differently.
>>
>>
>>
>> -view-isel-dags opened just fine in dotty in 3.4 and now this does
>> nothing without the filter-view-dags 'option' and now has a different
>> priority program list or something.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm just curious why this option should be mandatory?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150801/a6ee97e6/attachment.html>