[LLVMdev] AArch64 bot unstable
David Blaikie
dblaikie at gmail.com
Wed Apr 29 11:43:25 PDT 2015
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:19 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:05 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com
> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Ok, thanks for the suggestion. I will rework the tests to do that.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > In case you haven't found it already, %T in the lit syntax gives you a
> >> > uniquely named directory for the test
> >>
> >> Actually %T is just the base directory where all the
> >> compiler-rt/profile tests are run, not unique per .c test.
> >
> >
> > Ah, sorry for the misleading advice - thanks for the correction.
> >
> >>
> >> I fixed the
> >> tests by creating a "%t.d" directory and cd'ing into it and generating
> >> all output locally in that directory.
> >
> >
> > A quick "grep -r "RUN.*mkdir" certainly shows a few tests doing quite
> > similar things (most use -p, which I see you've done too).
> >
> > You'll probably also need REQUIRES: shell in this test to ensure it
> doesn't
> > run in environments that don't have a full bash-like shell available
> (such
> > as Windows). Check the other tests that use mkdir to see that sort of
> thing.
>
> Some have the "REQUIRES: shell" (e.g.
> tools/clang/test/VFS/include-virtual-from-real.c) and some don't (e.g.
> ./tools/clang/test/Analysis/html-diags.c). I looked around for
> documentation on when "REQUIRES: shell" is needed but couldn't find
> anything specific. The latter test (html-diags.c), which doesn't have
> the REQUIRES also does mkdir -p, cd, rm -rf", which are the same
> shell-like operations my tests are doing. The former
> (include-virtual-from-real.c) is doing some additional shell-like
> operations such as sed and echo, which I am not doing.
Sounds plausible then.
> Is there a list
> of operations safe to do without adding the "REQUIRES: shell"?
>
Not that I know of. Usually a bit of "oh, this fails on a windows buildbot
-> slap REQUIRES: shell on it" (maybe other people know more). But as
you've seen tests that don't seem to require it and do the same things your
test does - just go with it & if buildbots fail we'll figure it out then.
- David
>
> Thanks,
> Teresa
>
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Patch uploaded here, PTAL:
> >> http://reviews.llvm.org/D9349
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Teresa
> >>
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Teresa
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Eric Christopher <
> echristo at gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:36 AM Justin Bogner <
> mail at justinbogner.com>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> writes:
> >> >> >> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Renato Golin
> >> >> >> > <renato.golin at linaro.org>
> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On 29 April 2015 at 14:16, Teresa Johnson <
> tejohnson at google.com>
> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> Two of the compiler-rt/profile tests I added are checking for
> >> >> >> >>> similar
> >> >> >> >>> behavior with resetting the filename to the default. I wonder
> if
> >> >> >> >>> they
> >> >> >> >>> are running in parallel and clobbering each other since the
> >> >> >> >>> profile
> >> >> >> >>> output names are not unique after the reset.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Hi Teresa,
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> This would explain the intermittent failures. Maybe making the
> >> >> >> >> names
> >> >> >> >> unique would fix the issues, would that be an easy change?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > After thinking about it I believe this is what is most likely
> >> >> >> > happening, and that these two new tests I added will need to be
> >> >> >> > reverted:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> compiler-rt/trunk/test/profile/instrprof-override-filename-then-reset-default.c
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> compiler-rt/trunk/test/profile/instrprof-set-filename-then-reset-default.c
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > since they aren't writing to unique output names. These are 2 of
> >> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> > 4
> >> >> >> > tests added in r236056 (the other two are fine).
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > They can't be changed to write to a unique name since those
> tests
> >> >> >> > were
> >> >> >> > specifically testing that the profile output name gets reset to
> >> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> > default when null is passed to the profile filename setting
> >> >> >> > interfaces. The other profile tests use unique names.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Could we have these tests `cd` into a uniquely named directory or
> >> >> >> something? Maybe that's more complicated than its worth.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > That's what we've done in the past and seems a reasonable idea.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -eric
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Since I don't have write access yet, can someone revert those
> two
> >> >> >> > files for me?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Thanks,
> >> >> >> > Teresa
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> cheers,
> >> >> >> >> --renato
> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> LLVM Developers mailing list
> >> >> >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> >> >> >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohnson at google.com |
> >> >> 408-460-2413
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> LLVM Developers mailing list
> >> >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> >> >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohnson at google.com |
> 408-460-2413
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohnson at google.com | 408-460-2413
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150429/25569dfc/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list