[LLVMdev] what's the best way to insert an instruction after the current instruction

[Zhi Chen]

I see. Thanks.

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:

> Yes.
> So if you want the instruction after it, increase the iterator by 1.
> If Iterator + 1 was after BB->end() you had a bug anyway unless you
> were replacing the terminator :)
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:40 PM, zhi chen <zchenhn at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Does the insert point also mean inserting before the instruction?
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> IRBuilder takes an insertion point.
> >> Use it?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:17 PM, zhi chen <zchenhn at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > The current instruction is:
> >> >
> >> > Instruction *pInst;
> >> >
> >> > How can I create a new instruction, say add, after pInst?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Zhi
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> >> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> >> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> >> >
> >
> >
>



-- 
PhD Student
Department of Computer Science
University of California, Irvine
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150421/98033fa7/attachment.html>