[LLVMdev] More code owners needed

[Chris Lattner]

> On Apr 20, 2015, at 9:01 AM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've been going through my queue of candidate patches for the 3.6 branch,
> and I think the process could be smoother if we had more code owners.
> So, I'd like to encourage people to nominate themselves or others as
> code owners for any part of LLVM that doesn't already have one.
> 
> The responsibilities of a code owner include reviewing patches submitted
> to llvm-commits and approving merge requests to the stable branches.
> 
> To get the ball rolling, I'm going to start nominating new code owners whenever
> I get a stable merge request for an unowned component.  I'm going to try to
> determine the best code owner based on git history.  If I nominate you, there
> is no obligation to accept.  Feel free to decline or nominate someone else.

Sounds like a great idea, thanks Tom.

-Chris