[LLVMdev] [RFC] Raise minimum required CMake version to 3.0
Jonathan Roelofs
jonathan at codesourcery.com
Wed Apr 8 15:39:37 PDT 2015
On 4/8/15 4:36 PM, Zachary Turner wrote:
> By that logic we shouldn't have an 80 column limit in LLVM :)
Mind posting a link to the commit here so we can all second-guess your
fix? ;)
(More seriously, it'd be a useful breadcrumb for future CMake 3.0
discussions.)
Jon
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:35 PM Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com
> <mailto:chisophugis at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com
> <mailto:zturner at google.com>> wrote:
>
> When the line is like 400 characters, it's pretty obnoxious.
>
>
>
> I guess I'd need to see the particular situation, but in my
> experience most editors will wrap the line for you in a
> reasonable-enough way.
>
> -- Sean Silva
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:32 PM Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com
> <mailto:chisophugis at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Zachary Turner
> <zturner at google.com <mailto:zturner at google.com>> wrote:
>
> Just found another issue with CMake versions prior to
> 3.0. I need to write a long string, and prior to 3.0
> there is no line continuation for quoted arguments.
> This might seem minor, but it's one of those things that
> when you need to do it, it's really annoying for there
> to be no good workaround :-/
>
>
> Can't you just use longer lines? Seems pretty straightforward.
>
> -- Sean Silva
>
>
>
> http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/manual/cmake-language.7.html#quoted-argument
>
> "
>
> Note
>
> CMake versions prior to 3.0 do not support continuation
> with \. They report errors in quoted arguments
> containing lines ending in an odd number of \ characters."
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:21 AM Renato Golin
> <renato.golin at linaro.org
> <mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> wrote:
>
>
> On 16 March 2015 at 18:00, Zachary Turner
> <zturner at google.com <mailto:zturner at google.com>> wrote:
> > We can always just say "if you want to self host,
> you need 3.0 or higher",
> > but thought I would add this to the thread anyway.
>
> I think that would be wiser, especially it being an
> undocumented
> feature. But thanks for the heads up.
>
> cheers,
> --renato
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
>
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
--
Jon Roelofs
jonathan at codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list