[LLVMdev] why are volatile memory accesses ordered?
Sanjoy Das
sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com
Thu Apr 2 18:04:39 PDT 2015
Marking volatile accesses as !unordered seems excessively
conservative. For instance, LLVM is not able to optimize
declare void @escape(i32*)
declare i32 @read_only(i32) readonly
define i32 @f(i1* %c) {
entry:
%a = alloca i32
%b = alloca i32
call void @escape(i32* %a)
call void @escape(i32* %b)
%a0 = load i32, i32* %b, align 4
%lv = load volatile i32, i32* %b
%a1 = load i32, i32* %a, align 4
%result = add i32 %a0, %a1
ret i32 %result
}
to "%result = %a0 << 1" via -O3.
NB: changing the volatile load to a volatile store triggers the
optimization (via -instcombine) -- llvm::FindAvailableLoadedValue just
skips over noalias ordered stores.
-- Sanjoy
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list