[LLVMdev] Proposal for ""llvm.mem.vectorize.safelen"

[Renato Golin]

On 28 September 2014 22:09, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> Thanks Xinmin!
>
> So we'll need a method to ensure the correct (partial) ordering.

I thought that the idea was to avoid computing loop dependencies when
safelen is specified, at least at that level. We might do it to a
greater length, but we should assume it to be safe for distances < VL.

We still need the method, I agree, for everything else, though.

cheers,
--renato