[LLVMdev] RFC: LLVM should require a working C++11 <thread>, <mutex>, and <atomic>
Chandler Carruth
chandlerc at google.com
Wed Sep 24 10:12:40 PDT 2014
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info
> wrote:
> Also, can't we simply provide some dummy <mutex> / <thread> on mingw
> systems and warn loudly about single-threaded stuff?
>
I think it's a mistake. It becomes really hard to say we "support" a
platform when the user will have to hold LLVM just right in order to use it
correctly. =/
It also means we have to carry a bunch of "portability" cruft in LLVM.
These are not small or simple headers.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140924/b06f05e5/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list