[LLVMdev] Loops Prevent Function Pointer Inlining?

Renato Golin renato.golin at linaro.org
Wed Sep 24 08:29:41 PDT 2014


On 24 September 2014 13:51, Nicholas White <n.j.white at gmail.com> wrote:
> Or is some other pass getting tricked by the
> for loop (maybe because the load & store are no longer in the same
> basic block)?

That'd be my guess. Maybe looking for where the debug messages are
printed out and follow the code up.

cheers,
--renato



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list