[LLVMdev] proposal to avoid zlib dependency.

[Dennis Luehring]

Am 20.09.2014 20:26, schrieb Dan Liew:
> On 18 September 2014 16:59, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
> > I also want to point out that there is prior art for bundling these types of
> > single-source-file utility libraries in lib/Support. We have MD5.cpp,
> > ConvertUTF.cpp, and reg*.c implementing various bits of functionality.
> > Adding a miniz.c doesn't seem like that big of a deal.
>
> I should of taken a look at miniz first! It is pretty small. I guess provided
>

is miniz 100% zlib compatible? or is that not a need

i've tested miniz against zlib 2.7 month ago and miniz wasn't
always equaly able to decompress given data like zlib was

maybe i can recheck my application with current miniz