[LLVMdev] RFC: Are we ready to completely move away from the optionality of a DataLayout?

[Chandler Carruth]

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>
wrote:

> I have a question:
>
> > 1) Synthesizing a "default" boring DataLayout for all modules that don't
> > specify one.
>
> What is a default boring value for endianness?
>

Little. Sorry, but LE won here.

I mean, we could make the default big-endian just to test the less common
scenario, but I think it would just result in bugs in people's test cases
rather than teasing out actual bugs in their code.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20141019/4d0eadf1/attachment.html>