[LLVMdev] Proposal: add Go frontend subproject based on llgo
Peter Collingbourne
peter at pcc.me.uk
Thu Nov 20 12:46:41 PST 2014
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:16:49PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 04:58:08PM -0800, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:19:06AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:53:17PM -0800, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> > > > llgo depends on certain third-party components, namely a copy of the Go
> > > > standard library (libgo), a Go program analysis library (go.tools) and two
> > > > library dependencies of the standard library (libbacktrace and libffi).
> > >
> > > I think providing a better alternative to libffi is already a goal of
> > > some people, but what is libbacktrace needed for? What is not provided
> > > by the Itanium Unwind ABI?
> >
> > According to the libbacktrace readme file:
> >
> > > As of September 2012, libbacktrace only supports ELF executables with
> > > DWARF debugging information. The library is written to make it
> > > straightforward to add support for other object file and debugging
> > > formats.
>
> My question still stands. Do you use it for nice backtraces in debugging
> situations?
It appears so.
I did not write the code in libgo that deals with stack traces; Ian did. If
you have any other questions about this, it would be best to ask him.
Thanks,
--
Peter
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list