[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Symbol offsets

[Reid Kleckner]

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:

> P.S. You could also represent this with aliases with a non-zero offset
> from the beginning of the function.  Rafael is implementing this, but I
> don't think that's a very good representation.
>

I mean, I don't think it's a good representation for tables-before-code.  I
think it's a perfectly reasonable way to represent MSVC-style vftables that
have RTTI data, which we plan to do.


> What does it mean to inline through an alias to a function with a non-zero
> offset?  We could say that we just ignore the offset for analysis purposes,
> but it doesn't feel very clean.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140527/d8adbe9f/attachment.html>