[LLVMdev] ubsan suppression

David Blaikie dblaikie at gmail.com
Sat May 17 12:55:39 PDT 2014


Sanitize=undefined shouldn't be warning about unsigned overflow. Is well
defined.

Ignoring signed overflow is probably a bad idea. Llvm actually optimizes on
that.
On May 17, 2014 1:44 AM, "Roland Schulz" <roland at utk.edu> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> is there a way to suppress specific undefined sanitizer warnings, in
> particular for unsigned integer overflow? Either with a suppression file
> (similar to TSan) or even better with some in source annotation?
>
> Thanks
> Roland
>
> --
> ORNL/UT Center for Molecular Biophysics cmb.ornl.gov
> 865-241-1537, ORNL PO BOX 2008 MS6309
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140517/8531ea57/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list