[LLVMdev] gmail marking llvm emails as spam? Re:

[Robinson, Paul]

I wonder if gmail is having other issues. I read the lists from a gmail account; lately I’ve seen a few messages that were flagged as containing “suspicious” code, and both llvm-commits and cfe-commits have complained to me about excessive bounces in the past week.
--paulr

From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Sean Silva
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 11:14 AM
To: Carter Schonwald
Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] gmail marking llvm emails as spam? Re:

You can set up a gmail filter selecting mailing list emails and select "never mark as spam".

-- Sean Silva

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Carter Schonwald <carter.schonwald at gmail.com<mailto:carter.schonwald at gmail.com>> wrote:
i Don't know if others have raised this issue, but I'm seeing *a lot* of llvm-dev emails and cfe emails landing in my spam folder in gmail. Are other people having this problem?

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net<mailto:tom at stellard.net>> wrote:
Hi,

I would like to begin the 3.4.2 release process for LLVM.  There have
been two issues identified in 3.4.1, which there is interest in having
fixed in a 3.4.x release:

1. Build failure with gcc 4.9 (This is not a regression, 3.4 also fails
to build with gcc 4.9).

2. Accidental change of libLLVM's DT_SONAME  from libLLVM-3.4
libLLVM-3.4.1.so<http://libLLVM-3.4.1.so>

I will also accept any other bug-fixes that people want to submit as
long as they conform to the rules of stable releases:
http://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html#release-patch-rules

In order to get these fixes out quickly, we will have a very short period
for nominating bug-fixes, followed by our usually stable release testing phase.

Here is an approximate schedule:

Monday, May 12 to Thursday, May 15: Nominate bug-fixes for the 3.4 branch.
Friday, May 16 to Friday, May 23:   Testing Phase I
Monday, May 25:                     Release or Phase II of testing if necessary.

If you are interested in helping with release qualification testing
of  3.4.2, send me an email with the target, operating system and host
compiler you can test with.  Since we have fixes specifically for gcc
4.9 in this release we need some testers who can test with gcc 4.9.

Besides release qualification, it will be helpful to have people building
the 3.4 branch with gcc 4.9 and looking for potential issues.  This can be
done before the testing phase once the gcc 4.9 fixes have landed.

I have a busy schedule in the next month, so I would like to have one or more
backup up release managers, in case I am unable to make this release in a timely
manner.  If you are interested in this, let me know.

Thanks,
Tom
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev


_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140512/ec6ee5eb/attachment.html>