[LLVMdev] Lots of regtest failures on PPC64/Linux

Will Schmidt will_schmidt at vnet.ibm.com
Wed Mar 26 10:45:21 PDT 2014


On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 08:28 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org>
> > To: "İsmail Dönmez" <ismail at donmez.ws>
> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 8:14:18 AM
> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Lots of regtest failures on PPC64/Linux
> > 
> > Hi Ismail,
> > 
> > Is there a buildbot for that?
> 
> There *should* be. Will, we have a -mcpu=native bot now, right? Does it compile Release or Release+Asserts?
> 
>  -Hal

the mcpu=native bot is this one:
       {'name' : "clang-ppc64-elf-linux",
         'slavenames' :["chinook-clangslave1"],
...

There is no stage*_config= value specified.  A glance at the builder
itself shows "Release+Asserts".



note: that bot is continuing to fail during the LNT test with errors
such:
"
main.py:147: warning: --commit should be passed directly to the test suite.
...
lnt: error: no such option: -m
"

i.e. 
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64-elf-linux/builds/7269/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/stdio




> 
> > If not, can you bissect to find the
> > offending commit?
> > 
> > cheers,
> > --renato
> > 
> > On 26 March 2014 13:04, İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Recent trunk has a lot of failures on PPC64/Linux. One seems to be
> > > crash
> > > with a backtrace like:
> > >
> > > [ 3149s] --
> > > [ 3149s] 0  libLLVMSupport.so 0x00003fff7ed0b864
> > > llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(_IO_FILE*) + 4294746876
> > > [ 3149s] 1  libLLVMSupport.so 0x00003fff7ed0bb1c
> > > [ 3149s] 2  libLLVMSupport.so 0x00003fff7ed0c520
> > > [ 3149s] 3  linux-vdso64.so.1 0x00003fff7f7b0478
> > > __kernel_sigtramp_rt64 + 0
> > > [ 3149s] 4  libLLVMSupport.so 0x00003fff7ecfb448
> > > llvm::sys::AtomicIncrement(unsigned int volatile*) + 4294685040
> > > [ 3149s] 5  libLLVMCodeGen.so 0x00003fff7f64603c
> > > [ 3149s] 6  libLLVMCodeGen.so 0x00003fff7f641f84
> > > [ 3149s] 7  libLLVMCodeGen.so 0x00003fff7f63f16c
> > > [ 3149s] 8  libLLVMCodeGen.so 0x00003fff7f5b8220
> > > llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) +
> > > 4293027568
> > > [ 3149s] 9  libLLVMCore.so    0x00003fff7f35be3c
> > > llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) + 4294119036
> > > [ 3149s] 10 libLLVMCore.so    0x00003fff7f35c210
> > > llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) + 4294119968
> > > [ 3149s] 11 libLLVMCore.so    0x00003fff7f35c9d8
> > > llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) + 4294121888
> > > [ 3149s] 12 libLLVMCore.so    0x00003fff7f35d120
> > > llvm::legacy::PassManager::run(llvm::Module&) + 4294123632
> > > [ 3149s] 13 libLLVMMCJIT.so   0x00003fff7eff6a20
> > > llvm::MCJIT::emitObject(llvm::Module*) + 4294875216
> > > [ 3149s] 14 libLLVMMCJIT.so   0x00003fff7eff6dfc
> > > llvm::MCJIT::generateCodeForModule(llvm::Module*) + 4294876180
> > > [ 3149s] 15 libLLVMMCJIT.so   0x00003fff7eff7674
> > > llvm::MCJIT::finalizeObject() + 4294878228
> > > [ 3149s] 16 lli               0x000000001000cf9c main + 4294831444
> > > [ 3149s] 17 libc.so.6         0x00003fff7e5f796c
> > > [ 3149s] 18 libc.so.6         0x00003fff7e5f7b74 __libc_start_main
> > > +
> > > 4293370644
> > >
> > > Others seems to be unexpected outputs. Any help tracking these down
> > > would be
> > > appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > ismail
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> > >
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> > 
> 





More information about the llvm-dev mailing list