[LLVMdev] Phabricator and private reviews
Eli Bendersky
eliben at google.com
Wed Jun 25 11:03:31 PDT 2014
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com> wrote:
> For whatever reason, patches posted to the Phabricator website still
> aren't being sent to the mailing list, making it difficult for us to review
> them.
>
> I've raised this issue a couple of times in the last few weeks.
>
> In practice this has a detrimental effect to the development workflow
> because it means that code is being seen only by a small group of
> individuals who have web accounts. The code isn't hitting llvm-commits or
> cfe-commits where the majority of code maintainers use the mailing lists
> for review.
>
> At this point I think Phabricator should be disabled and patches should be
> send to the mailing lists *until* the technical issue is confirmed resolved.
>
> It's really uncool that code is entering ToT through this back-channel --
> I appreciate that it might not be intentional, but every single patch that
> gets committed this way is a real problem for the project.
Phabricator has certainly had its share of technical difficulties lately.
Just last week it suppressed all email to llvm-commits for many hours.
These problems should be solved. That said, talking of "private reviews"
and "back-channels" doesn't strike me as constructive.
Eli
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140625/4db779cd/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list