[LLVMdev] [RFC] Add a simple soft-float class

[Owen Anderson]

On Jun 18, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Bruce Hoult <bruce at hoult.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote:
> Numerical analysis is hard.  Every numerics expert I have ever worked with considers trying to re-invent floating point a cardinal sin of numerical analysis.  Just don’t do it.  You will miss important considerations, and you will pay the price for it later.
> 
> I don't think anyone is planning to use it to write climate models. Or simulate airflow over a 787. Or even invert a near-singular matrix.
> 
> This is for jobs that *could* perfectly well be done with a simple integer with an implied scale factor, if you could easily and reliably predict in advance exactly what scale factor is appropriate for each value.
> 
> This simply keeps track of the scale factor for you, so you can't get it wrong.

If you couldn’t get it wrong, we wouldn’t have had so much difficulty getting the current version to work.

—Owen

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140618/ae4d963a/attachment.html>