[LLVMdev] [lld] LLD's software architecture (update)
Rui Ueyama
ruiu at google.com
Mon Jun 2 00:49:40 PDT 2014
I agree to move these files to Core. Any objections?
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Bas van den Berg <
b.van.den.berg.nl at gmail.com> wrote:
> The inverted dependency of Core to ReaderWriter via Simple.h was already
> present.
> My idea was to fix the problem before it gets bigger.
> My proposal would be to move Simple.h and Alias.h to Core. Similar to
> UndefinedAtom.h etc.
> It would be even nicer to make the naming consistent as well, since there
> already is
> UndefinedAtom.h
> SharedLibaryAtom.h
> etc
>
> Maybe:
> SimpleAtom.h
> AliasAtom.h
>
> Moving the file to core fixes the dependencies.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Bas van den Berg <
>> b.van.den.berg.nl at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been following the changes in LLD's software architecture.
>>> Recently a new file was added: Alias.h
>>> In this file, the curret Atom set is extended with an AliasAtom.
>>> While the change seems innocent enough, it has some nasty
>>> potential. Simple.h and Alias.h are placed in the ReaderWriter
>>> component. This is the 2nd component in the layering:
>>> Driver
>>> ReaderWriter
>>> Passes
>>> Core
>>>
>>> The problem is that Core depends on these files. So in my opinion,
>>> they belong to that Component. The greater impact here is that
>>> once core starts depending on ReaderWriter, architecture Erosion
>>> will happen. This would obviously not be a good thing, since the
>>> current design is fresh and clean.
>>>
>>
>> Core's dependency to Simple.h was there before the addition of Alias.h,
>> so it's not new. And I don't feel like it's that bad as you might be
>> feeling. Do you have any suggestion to get rid of it? Just moving the file
>> to Core?
>>
>> I would love to supply patches, but am having issues getting
>>> lld to build under Ubuntu 12.04. (but that's another story ;) ).
>>>
>>> I've posted the updated architecture view here:
>>> http://www.c2lang.org/docs/lld_architecture_20140602.png
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140602/6400e0ce/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list