[LLVMdev] GHC, aliases, and LLVM HEAD

[Ben Gamari]

Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> writes:

> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com
>> wrote:
>
>> > It looks fairly likely llvm will accept arbitrary expressions as
>> > aliasees again (see thread on llvmdev), but the restrictions inherent
>> > from what alias are at the object level will remain, just be reworded
>> > a bit. For example, we will have something along the lines of "the
>> > aliasee expression cannot contain an undefined GlobalValue".
>>
>> And this is in: r210062.
>>
>> Let us know how it looks from GHC's point of view.
>
>
> I think we might be able to relax our restrictions against aliases
> referring to declarations if the alias is private.  If the alias is
> private, then the label never appears in the object file.  The alias is
> merely a Constant with an internal name.  What do you think?

Any word on this? As far as I can tell we are stuck on the GHC side
until we can alias declarations due to the existence of untyped external
references in the C-- representation.

Cheers,

- Ben
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 472 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140720/9e39156e/attachment.sig>