[LLVMdev] LLVM commit 410f38e01597120b41e406ec1cea69127463f9e5

[Matt Arsenault]

On 07/08/2014 03:20 PM, Matt Arsenault wrote:
> Alternatively maybe this should only be done if the setcc type is the 
> same as the sext result?
I think we should actually do this. If you need to convert the setcc 
result after, you aren't really gaining anything by doing this 
transformation
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140708/37084110/attachment.html>