[LLVMdev] RFC: GEP as canonical form for pointer addressing

[Philip Reames]

On 02/15/2014 12:27 PM, Philip Reames wrote:
> To be clear, this is somewhat separate from my proposal.  I only care 
> that inttoptr+arithmetic+inttoptr sequences aren't inserted in the 
> place of GEPs.
To correct myself...

This was in fact one of the corollaries I listed in my original 
proposal.  I can drop it without effecting my core use case. This is 
what I should have said rather than the above.

Philip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140218/46dd1841/attachment.html>